Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 307
Credle et al v. SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., et al
as 5:2017cv07281
Plaintiff: Joshua Credle , Jeremiah McCuller , Jaylen McCuller and others
Defendant: SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., Samsung SDI Co, Ltd, Voege Precision Machine Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Michael Frank Bednarz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17367
: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: MICHAEL FRANK BEDNARZ
Defendant - Appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SANYO ELECTRIC CO, LTD and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Christopher Andrew We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17369
: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SANYO ELECTRIC CO, LTD and others
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Simplo Technology USA, et al v. Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al
as 17-17241
: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SANYO ELECTRIC CO, LTD and others
Movant - Appellant: SIMPLO TECHNOLOGY USA LOGISTIC COMPANY, LTD., Non-Party
Daniel Ramirez v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07684
Defendant: Amperex Technology Limited, Does, Samsung C And T America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Ramirez
The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al v. Samsung SDI Company LTD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv01688
Defendant: Asustek Computer Inc, Simplo Technology Company LTD, Samsung SDI America Inc and others
Plaintiff: Terry A Burgess DDS, Inc, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Auto-Owners Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re EDNY Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Cases
as 1:2017mc02038
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, CompuCom Systems Inc and others
Defendant: Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co Ltd, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
In re EDNY Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Cases We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv04504
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, CompuCom Systems Inc and others
Defendant: Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co Ltd, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv03409
Defendant: Samtel Color, LTD., Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?