Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32991
Plaintiff: SAMUEL PHILLIPS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15245
Plaintiff: SAMUEL PHILLIPS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06960
Plaintiff: SAMUEL PHILLIPS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JEFFERSON v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04681
Plaintiff: TROY JEFFERSON, JENNIFER LIGHT, ROBERT SUMMERS and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCKINNON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03081
Plaintiff: DANIEL HUTCHINSON, BRANDON SHEENE, BENNETT STANLEY and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al v. Priority Healthcare Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01479
Defendant: Tombigbee Pharmacy LLC, Ashley Tigrett, Jasper Express Care Pharmacy LLC and others
Plaintiff: Roche Diabetes Care Inc and Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv00805
Petitioner: Samuel Phillip Davis
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Danow v. Gish We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00455
Plaintiff: Samuel Phillip Danow
Defendant: Matthew Channell Gish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luciano v. Irick et al
as 2:2013cv14467
Plaintiff: Samuel Phillip Luciano
Defendant: Vance Irick and Ernie Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?