Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Pierson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03006
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pierson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sileoni v. Hammon et al
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Ashley Hammon, Kaylene Hartt, Tanya Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maximiliano v. Timmermans, et al.
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sileoni Maximiliano
Defendant:
Philippe Timmermans, Rona Siegert, Chris Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Timpiermas et al
as 1:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Craig Keller, Rona Siegert, Chris Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Corizon Correctional Health Services et al
as 1:2020cv00293
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Health Services, Sgt. Taylor, Dr. April Dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent D. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Gomez v. Henry Atencio, et al
as 20-35396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGLIORI, RONA SIEGERT, CCHP, RN, MATT VALLEY and others
Defendant:
STEVEN NEWSOME, JOSHA TUCKETT and BROWN
Piro v. Carlin et al
as 1:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Piro
Defendant:
Justin Armstrong, D W McKay, Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pieksma v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Scott W Pieksma
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Corizon Correctional Healthcare, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, Samuel Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
