Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lynn Gavin et al v. Fortress Investment Group LLC et al
as 2:2024cv08607
Defendant:
London Breed, Gavin Newsom, David P. Wasserman and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn Gavin and Bamidele Hambolu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Rogers v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN F. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moreno v. Brettkelly et al
as 3:2020cv02082
Defendant:
Anthony Brettkelly, Port of San Francisco, Mats Nalsen and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rigoberto Moreno
Synergy Project Management, In v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 19-17558
Defendant / Appellee:
LONDON BREED, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MOHAMMED NURU and others
Defendant:
SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY and SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYNERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
