Cases 41 - 50 of 186
Sanchez v. Kline et al
as 9:2019cv00877
Defendant:
William Lee, Gray and J. Kline
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Castro et al
as 1:2019cv02104
Defendant:
C.O. Gonzalez, Davis, Cynthia Baran and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2018cv01488
Defendant:
The State of New York and Mr. Anthony J. Annucci
Plaintiff:
Angelo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cano v. Cohen et al
as 1:2018cv11550
Defendant:
Robert T. Johnson, Michael Tannousis, Eddie Small and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2018cv11131
Defendant:
Correction Officer Phillips, The City of New York, Captain Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2018cv11110
Defendant:
Captain Liburd, Captain Davis and Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cano v. Cohen et al
as 1:2018cv10712
Defendant:
Michael Tannousis, Eddie Small, Khaleeq Middleton and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peguero-Sanchez v. Gerbing
as 2:2018cv06320
Petitioner:
Julio Peguero-Sanchez
Respondent:
Kathleen Gerbing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2018cv10276
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Corrections, The City of New York, Captain Liburd and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Dastur #553 et al
as 1:2018cv10053
Defendant:
Dastur #553, Blake #26469, Sanchez#6382 and others
Plaintiff:
Umi Judith Bey
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
