Cases 61 - 70 of 84
PINEDA v. NEIGHBOR'S CONSEJO et al
as 1:2014cv02218
Plaintiff:
CELIA PINEDA
Defendant:
NEIGHBOR'S CONSEJO , MILTON SANCHEZ and NANCY MORAN-GAITAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DYER v. POLICE OFFICERS et al
as 1:2014cv02097
Plaintiff:
DONNELL M. DYER
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICERS, JERRY L. WILLIAMS, PHEANAS YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HERNANDEZ et al v. P N DRYWALL CONTRACTOR, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01467
Plaintiff:
VICTOR HERNANDEZ , ADRIAN SANCHEZ , OSCAR ALONSO SANDOBAL and others
Defendant:
P N DRYWALL CONTRACTOR, LLC and P & D CONTRACTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
CORTEZ et al v. ELITE CLEANING SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01372
Plaintiff:
SONIA CORTEZ , ADELA VELASQUEZ and CLAUDIO SANCHEZ
Defendant:
ELITE CLEANING SERVICES, LLC and MEHMET IBIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
DIAZ v. NEIGHBORS CONSEJO et al
as 1:2014cv01146
Plaintiff:
JUDITH BERTHA DIAZ
Defendant:
NEIGHBORS CONSEJO and MILTON SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALANIZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv01812
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SANCHEZ-ALANIZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ALANIS v. WARDEN COPENHAVEN
as 1:2013cv01646
Petitioner:
MARTIN SANCHEZ ALANIS
Respondent:
WARDEN COPENHAVEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ADAIR et al v. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION et al
as 1:2013cv01093
Plaintiff:
ERIK MODISETT , JOSUE E. MORENO , JORDON REIF and others
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
SANCHEZ ALANIS v. WOODS
as 1:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SANCHEZ ALANIS
Defendant:
WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
