Cases
Hart v. Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08919
Plaintiff: BARBARA HART
Defendant: FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC., Michael D. Clayman, Patrick J. Mahaffy and others
Al Lutzker v. Douglas S. Ingram et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant: Michael W. Bonney, Douglas S. Ingram, Richard J. Barry and others
Plaintiff: Al Lutzker
Nominal Defendant: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Salinger v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv08122
Defendant: Douglas S. Ingram, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Sandesh Mahatme
Plaintiff: Andrew Salinger
Kader, et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM KADER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, MORAD GHODOOSHIM, ROGER LAM and others
Defendant - Appellee: SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., CHRIS GARABEDIAN, SANDESH MAHATME and others
Cobran, et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al
as 16-1658
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK A. COBRAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and STEVE FLEISCHMANN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: DANIEL BARADARIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and BIJESH AMIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., CHRIS GARABEDIAN and ED KAYE
Defendant: SANDESH MAHATME
Interested Party: BRIAN HEIDRICH and CORBAN GROUP
Cherry v. Behrens et al
as 1:2016cv10531
Plaintiff: Dawn Cherry
Defendant: M. Kathleen Behrens, Anthony Chase, William Goolsbee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kader v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv14318
Plaintiff: William Kader
Defendant: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Christopher Garabedian and Sandesh Mahatme
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?