Cases 1 - 10 of 32
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. WOOTEN
as 1:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
SANDRA K WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC v. RODERICK
as 1:2020cv00392
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Defendant:
SANDRA L RODERICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHNEIDER et al v. ABC INC et al
as 2:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
DARRYL SCHNEIDER and SANDRA KIMBALL
Defendant:
AGENCY FOR COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICES, FLORIDA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DAVID BOWDICH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KING v. SOUTHERN ROAD & BRIDGE LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00470
Defendant:
JMM ENTERPRISES INC, DYLAN R ALLARD, MICHAEL G TSANGARIS and others
Plaintiff:
SANDRA E KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. BUTLER et al
as 1:2019cv00218
Defendant:
SANDRA E BUTLER and JOHN J BUTLER, III
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. HICKS et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
SANDRA D HICKS and PETER R HICKS
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L CAREY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
EWER v. MORIN et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
DYLAN MARC EWER
Defendant:
JEFFREY MORIN, SHANE TYRELL, GREGORY CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2016cv00632
Plaintiff:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant:
SANDRA A FITZGERALD and THOMAS R FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEHMAN et al v. LOXTERKAMP, MD et al
as 1:2016cv00548
Plaintiff:
FRANK LEHMAN and SANDRA PIECHOCKI
Defendant:
DAVID LOXTERKAMP, MD, PENOBSCOT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
