Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Murphy et al v. Procter and Gamble Company
as 2:2008cv15170
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy, Robert Sands, David Aaron Gross and others
Defendant:
Procter and Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Daniel v. Paionte et al
as 2:2008cv13999
Plaintiff:
Allen Daniel
Defendant:
Lori Paionte, Sheba M Lazarus, Marcy Newton and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. John R. Concrete & Supply Company et al
as 2:2008cv13896
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
John R. Concrete & Supply Company and John R. Sand & Gravel Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Daniel v. Granholm
as 2:2008cv10999
Plaintiff:
Allen Daniel and Maryleen Emerson-Baily
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Michigan Attorney General's Office, Mike Cox and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Sand #193832 v. Hofbauer
as 2:2007cv00238
Petitioner:
Jeffery Sand #193832
Defendant:
Jerry Hofbauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Surles v. Andison et al
as 1:2007cv13555
Plaintiff:
Samuel Surles
Defendant:
Donald Andison, Patricia L Caruso, Connie Travino and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Herbert v. Roark et al
as 2:2007cv13364
Plaintiff:
David Herbert
Defendant:
Roark, Barkway, Bourne and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Proctor et al v. Applegate et al
as 2:2007cv12414
Plaintiff:
Fred Proctor, Perry Alva Hurd, Jr., Gilbert Jividen and others
Defendant:
L Applegate, R Sands, D Hill and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Herbert v. Roark et al
as 2:2005cv74754
Plaintiff:
David Herbert
Defendant:
Roark, Anderson, Belen and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
