Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US et al v. SEBELIUS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01546
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US, DURK PEARSON, SANDY SHAW and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MARGARET A. HAMBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Type: Other Statutes None
ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US et al v. SEBELIUS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01523
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US, DUKE PEARSON, SANDY SHAW and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MARGARET A. HAMBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Type: Other Statutes None
ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US et al v. SEBELIUS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01470
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US, DURK PEARSON, SANDY SHAW and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MARGARET A. HAMBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Type: Other Statutes None
SANDY v. CONNELLY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00925
Plaintiff: BAEZ SANDY
Defendant: CONNELLY, MICHEAL NAYLOR, Anthony CARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sam H. James, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 08-5448
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sam H. James, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice, United States Court of Appeals, For the Third Circuit and others
JAMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00474
Plaintiff: SAM H. JAMES, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIRD CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GOODING v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv00110
Plaintiff: JAMEY GOODING
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES, DAVID JUSTICE, WAYNE HUFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOSEPH et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00393
Petitioner: JESNY ANN JOSEPH and VINOD MATHEW
Respondent: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banner, James M., et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-5190
Plaintiff - Appellant: James M. Banner, Jr., Henry J. Brothers, II, Marilyn Tyler Brown and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Bathrus B. Williams
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice and Alberto R. Gonzales, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Defendant - Terminated Party: John D. Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Commonwealth of Virginia and State of Maryland
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia, Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: District of Columbia Affairs Section and Former Presidents of the District of Columbia Bar
Whitaker, Julian, et al v. Thompson, Tommy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-5020
Plaintiff - Appellant: Julian M. Whitaker, Pure Encapsulations, Incorporated, Durk Pearson and others
Defendant - Appellee: Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Mark B. McClellan, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration and others
Amicus Curiae: American Herbal Products Association

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?