Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Clark v. Hill County Jail
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric James Clark
Defendant:
Hill County Jail, Sandy Lynn Cook, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Warden, USP Big Sandy
as 5:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Christopher James Davila
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davila v. Warden, USP Big Sandy
as 5:2023cv00097
Petitioner:
Christopher James Davila
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stone et al v. The City of Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Maxzine Byrd and others
Defendant:
The City of Dallas County Texas, Jim Bowles, Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coalwell v. Gately
as 6:2021cv00485
Plaintiff:
Scott Eldred Coalwell
Defendant:
Sandy S. Gately
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 6:2020cv00262
Defendant:
Warden Donna Kazmierczak, Asst. Warden Karen Stroleny, Robert N. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Yvette Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 6:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Thu Le, Olsson LNU, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Coltart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings v. Beavers et al
as 3:2019cv01839
Plaintiff:
Robert E Stallings, Sr
Defendant:
Mr NFN Compton, Ms Sandy NLN and Mr NFN Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saienni III v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Sandy M Johnson, Karen Pelletier and A9
Plaintiff:
Dennis Saienni III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
