Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Evans v. Sandy City et al
as 2:2014cv00329
Plaintiff:
Steve Ray Evans
Defendant:
Sandy City , Tom Dolan , James H. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neilson v. Stanley Steemer International et al
as 2:2013cv00670
Plaintiff:
Ruth Neilson
Defendant:
Stanley Steemer International and Stanley Steemer of Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Klein v. Heiner et al
as 2:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Douglas Heiner and Sandy Heiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Cheesebrough v. Sandy City Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Brendan Ross Cheesebrough
Defendant:
Sandy City Police Department, FNU Roberts and Courtney Koehler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metronomics et al v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Metronomics , Thrive Systems and Thrive National
Defendant:
J. Hoyt Stephenson , River Enterprises , Just Fitness 4U and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephenson et al v. Metronomics et al
as 1:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
J. Hoyt Stephenson , Today's Fitness , Just Fitness of Alpharetta and others
Defendant:
Metronomics , Thrive National and Bailey N. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawker et al v. Sandy City Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Britt Joy Hawker and Craig Dee Hawker
Defendant:
Sandy City Corporation and Tina Maria Albrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fizer et al v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator
as 1:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Clint Fizer and Sandy Fizer
Defendant:
Thyssenkrupp Elevator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
