Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Jonas v. PWCC et al
as 4:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
Sandy Jonas
Defendant:
PWCC and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Associated Press et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
The Associated Press , Idaho Statesman Publishing, LLC , Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter , Robin Sandy , Howard G. "J.R.&q Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonas v. Reinke et al
as 4:2012cv00251
Plaintiff:
Sandy Jonas
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Jim Woolf, LeeAnne Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fizer et al v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator et al
as 4:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Clint Fizer and Sandy Fizer
Defendant:
ThyssenKrupp Elevator and John and/or Jane Does I through V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanc et al v. Reinke et al
as 4:2011cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Blanc, Sandy Jonas, Kathryn Vann and others
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Jim Woolf, LeeAnne Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Diggs
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baccus, Jr
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beeson v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Milo Beeson
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrick v. Sandy et al
as 1:2010cv00603
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, Jay Nielsen, Carolyn Meline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood et al v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00277
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood, James Earl Newman, Thomas Baccus, Jr and others
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
