Cases 11 - 20 of 163
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 0:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex, Department of Corrections, The Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jasper Reed and Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Wallace
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Niece, Lt. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Tramell Deon Young
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hale v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Jaquan Arkeem Hale
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morel v. Pearce et al
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Kevin Pearce, James Adams, Nathan Tussey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
