Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PERKINS v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC.
as 1:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
PAULA PERKINS
Defendant:
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WATSON-DAVIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JANELLE NICOLE WATSON-DAVIS
Defendant:
JASON WILLIAMS and SANTANDER CONSUMER USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Singh v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Singh
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ragans et al v. NAR Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA doing business as Chrysler Capital, NAR Services, NAR Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Valenica, Malcolm Eastlack Ragans and Miguel Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brooks et al v. Santander Consumer USA
as 5:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Im Brooks and Makeda Brooks
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lesane v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00602
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc. and Collateral Recovery, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Lavena Lesane
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
