Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 7:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant:
Tracey Beltz, Sara Hennessey and Janett Kindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 7:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant:
Tracey Beltz, Keith Ellison, Jannett Kindall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Wanda Mason, Trey Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desouze v. Osteen et al
as 4:2023cv04198
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Joel Osteen, Victoria Osteen, Sara Jo Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. Federal Custody
as 1:2023cv01382
Petitioner:
Sara Herrera
Respondent:
Federal Custody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunn v. Darnell et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edrick Jamar Dunn
Defendant:
Jim Bob Darnell, Barbara Sucsy and Sara L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
Wendell Roy Mitchell
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Penny Kemp, Greg Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Darnell et al
as 5:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Edrick Jamar Dunn
Defendant:
Jim Bob Darnell, Barbara Sucsy and Sara L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
