Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DOE v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
SARA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NORWICH COMMERCIAL GROUP INC v. OHMEIS
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
NORWICH COMMERCIAL GROUP INC doing business as NORCOM MORTGAGE
Defendant:
SARA OHMEIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00407
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
POOLE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY POOLE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, SCOTT KANE, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AJAX MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST v. BURK
as 1:2022cv00243
Defendant:
SARA F BURK, ASHA SARA FENN and ASHA FENN
Plaintiff:
AJAX MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
HALSEY et al v. FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES INC
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
SARA HALSEY and SUSAN KIRALIS-VERNON
Defendant:
FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOPKINS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2020cv00304
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
SARA JEAN HOPKINS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOHAN v. PICORD et al
as 2:2020cv00268
Defendant:
SANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATT BOCHOE, STACEY NEWTON and others
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY BOHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOND v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
TROY JACKSON, MATTHEW DUNLAP, JANET MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY BOND
Petitioner:
ETHAN WELD ALCORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
