Cases 1 - 10 of 100
FRANKLIN v. HANCOCK et al
as 5:2026cv00258
Plaintiff:
MYRON C FRANKLIN
Defendant:
GLENN HANCOCK, MANUEL CABEZAS, SARAH ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv81169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv81166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Message v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv02020
Plaintiff:
Sarah Message
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Coleman Karsen v. Marion County, Florida et al
as 5:2026cv00645
Plaintiff:
Carla Latrell Coleman Karsen
Defendant:
Marion County, Florida, Billy Woods, City of Dunnellon, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv81094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FRANKLIN v. HANCOCK et al
as 5:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
MYRON C FRANKLIN
Defendant:
GLENN HANCOCK, E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, SARAH ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleischman v. The Schools of McKeel Academy, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv02483
Plaintiff:
Daniel Benjamin Fleischman
Defendant:
The Schools of McKeel Academy, Inc., Principal John Massung, Michelle Poppell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
