Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SAUCEDO v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00057
Defendant:
CLAIMS MANAGEMENT INC and WALMART, INC.
Plaintiff:
JUAN GURROLA SAUCEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC v. SAUCEDO
as 3:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC
Defendant:
ROSALINA SAUCEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quirino et al v. Saucedo et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Quirino , Ricardo Hernandez Quintero , Osvaldo Ruvacalba Haros and others
Defendant:
Francisco Saucedo and The Pine Straw Man, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roberts v. Saucedo
as 5:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
Francisco J. Saucedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banegas et al v. Reliable Drywall Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02674
Plaintiff:
Leonel Banegas , Mariela Mejia , Zeluma Mendoza and others
Defendant:
Reliable Drywall Contractors, Inc., Saucedos Drywall LLC and Timothy S. Looney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Southeastern Carpenters Regional Council et al v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv04071
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Carpenters Regional Council , Luis Alberto Borja, Jr. and United States of America, ex rel.
Cross_claimant:
Fulton County, Georgia and Custom Interiors & Acoustics, LLC
Cross_defendant:
Custom Interiors & Acoustics, LLC , Saucedos Drywall, LLC and SoCo Contracting Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Saucedo v. United State of America
as 2:2013cv00125
Petitioner:
Alberto Saucedo, Jr.
Respondent:
United State of America
Saucedo-Gonzalez v. Holt et al
as 1:2010cv02472
Plaintiff:
Luis Saucedo-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Raymond E. Holt and Rufus Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saucedo-Gonzales v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv02338
Plaintiff:
Luis Salvador Saucedo-Gonzales
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
