Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Strahan v. McKiernan, et al
as 22-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, a/k/a Man Against Xtinction, a/k/a MAX
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES, JANET COIT, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Strahan v. MEOEEA, et al
as 22-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, Secretary, DAVID PIERCE, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF), DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF) and others
Defendant:
ARTHUR SAWYER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as President of the Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association (MLA), CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, JOHN HAVILAND and others
Interested Party:
MICHAEL J. MOORE, M.D., PETER CORKERON and UNITED STATES
Strahan v.McKiernan et al
as 1:2022cv10364
Defendant:
Whale Killing Bastard, Daniel McKieran, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Richard Strahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strahan v. MEOEEA, et al
as 21-1178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S SURVIVAL FUND
Defendant:
CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, JOHN HAVILAND, BAYSTATE WIND, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, Secretary, DAVID PIERCE, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF) and DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF)
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN, a/k/a Man Against Xtinction and RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Strahan v. MEOEEA, et al
as 21-1154
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S SURVIVAL FUND, CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, JOHN HAVILAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID PIERCE, in his official capacity as Director of Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF), MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, Secretary and DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN, in his official capacity as Director of Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Strahan v. MEOEEA, et al
as 20-1281
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN HAVILAND, DAVID PIERCE, in his official capacity as Director of Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF), VINEYARD WIND, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Strahan v. Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs et al
as 1:2019cv10639
Plaintiff:
Richard Max Strahan, Max, Pro Se Party Richard Max Strahan and others
Defendant:
Secretary, Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs ("MEOEEA"), Arthur Sawyer, Center for Coastal Studies and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Survival Fund
Petitioner:
Dr. Michael J. Moore
Interested Party:
Peter Corkeron and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
US v. Sawyer
as 15-1939
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN PATRICK SAWYER, a/k/a Spsawyer14
US v. Sawyer
as 15-1928
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN PATRICK SAWYER, a/k/a Spsawyer14
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
