Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wiseman v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
as 4:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Steven Wiseman
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lopez v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
as 3:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Hector Lopez
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Meyer v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
as 3:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meyer
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Dewan, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.
as 4:2015cv01746
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dewan
Defendant:
M-I, L.L.C. , Smith International Acquisition Corp. and Schlumberger Technology Corp
Intervenor:
Sarmad Syed and Ashley Balfour
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Element Six U.S. Corporation v. Novatek Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Element Six U.S. Corporation
Defendant:
Novatek Inc. , David R Hall and Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Rotatable Technologies LLC v. Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Rotatable Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. , PlainsCapital Corp. , Rackspace Hosting Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Schlumber Technology et al v. Baker Hughes Inc.
as 4:2012cv03573
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Inc.
Plaintiff:
Schlumberger Technology Corp. , Smith International, Inc. and Specialised Petroleum Services Group Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Robertson v. Schlumberger Technology Corp. et al
as 4:2012cv02065
Plaintiff:
Carter Robertson
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp. and Schlumberger Limited (Schlumberger N.V.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
