Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 63
MARTENS v. PNEUMO ABEX, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02971
Defendant: GLEASON CORPORATION, EATON ELECTRICAL, INC., W. J. MALONE ASSOCIATES and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT D MARTENS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WHERRY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03376
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and others
Cross Defendant: AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, PEP BOYS and others
Cross Claimant: INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, PEERLESS PUMP and others
Plaintiff: GAIL ANN JAKUBAC-WHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
RUSSO et al v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03024
Defendant: SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC., GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. and others
Plaintiff: FRANK C. RUSSO and HANNAH RUSSO
Counter Defendant: DOW SILICONES CORPORATION and GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC.
Respondent: ABB, INC.
Petitioner: COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Flowers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff: Janis Flowers , James Flowers and Gerald Flowers, Jr.
Defendant: 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant: Aurora Pump Company , Honeywell International, Inc. , Dap Products Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Aurora Pump Company , 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY et al v. FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03910
Plaintiff: JAMES MURPHY and LORRAINE MURPHY
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, BLACKMER PUMP CO. and others
Cross_claimant: FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC.
Cross_defendant: FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , 3-M COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MURPHY et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED et al
as 2:2017cv03898
Plaintiff: JAMES MURPHY and LORRAINE MURPHY
Defendant: ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED , BLACKER PUMP CO. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: 3-M COMPANY , CRANE CO. , ROCKWELL AUTOMATION and others
Cross_defendant: 3-M COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chroniger et al v. ABB, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff: James R. Chroniger and Darlene Chroniger
Defendant: ABB, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Union Carbide Corporation, Siemens Industry, Inc. , Flowserve US, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Union Carbide Corporation , A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tibbets v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff: Ronald L. Tibbets
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill Co., BW/IP Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Union Carbide Corporation, The Marley-Wylain Company, Pfizer Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Union Carbide Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KNIBBS et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 5:2017cv00092
Defendant: PFIZER INC, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., PFIZER INC. and others
Plaintiff: KNIBBS, ROBERT C. KNIBBS, SR. and TERRY KNIBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hillyer et al v. ABB Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00378
Plaintiff: Mark E. Hillyer and Carol Hillyer
Defendant: ABB Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill Co. and others
Cross_claimant: Neles-Jamesbury Inc. , Siemens Industry Inc. , ABB Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Neles-Jamesbury Inc. , ABB Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?