Torts - Injury Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Polly Gastrom v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10464
Plaintiff: Polly Gastrom and Suzzane Nesbit
Defendant: Vigor Industrial LLC, 3M Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Randolph Morton et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05956
Defendant: Schneider Electric USA Inc, Union Carbide Corporation, -, CBS Corporation (f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger with CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to BF STURTEVANT) and others
Plaintiff: Edna S. Morton and Randolph Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Brian Houghton v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03133
Plaintiff: Brian Houghton, Stanley Houghton, Susan Effinger and others
Defendant: SYD Carpenter, Marine Contractor, Inc., Hennessy Industries, Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Stephen N Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Larry Armstrong et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01039
Defendant: 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Limited and others
Plaintiff: Carolyn Armstrong and Larry Armstrong
Ronald Harris v. Asbestos Corporation Limited et al
as 2:2013cv05743
Defendant: A O Smith Corporation, A W Chesterton Company, Armstrong International Inc and others
Plaintiff: Ronald Harris
Benjamin Lara, Jr. et al v. CBS Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv05569
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Eaton Corporation, First Doe through Two Hundred Seventy-Fifth Doe and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin Lara, Jr. and Mary Lara
Christina Pica-Van Dyke et al v. Bulldog Manufacturing Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06505
Defendant: Bulldog Manufacturing Company, CBS Corporation, Certaineed Corporation and others
ThirdParty Defendant: CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. and Roes
Unknown: Derek S Johnson, Charles T Sheldon, Allison Low and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff: Phillip Alan Pica, Tina Marie Pica and Christina Pica-Van Dyke
Lee E. Knowles v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02284
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Amtrol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Joyce Knowles and Lee E. Knowles

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?