Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Holland v. RiteAid Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
David Holland
Defendant:
RiteAid Corp., John T Standley, Darren Karst and others
Filing Error.
as 1:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
David Holland
Defendant:
John T Standley, Darren Karst, Heyward Donigan and others
Morgan v. Schroeder Referral Systems, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Ann Morgan
Defendant:
Schroeder Referral Systems, Inc. doing business as Injury Referral Group
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Schroeder v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 3:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schroeder
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and United Steelworkers Local 207L
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Michael et al v. Burkey
as 3:2020cv01483
Plaintiff:
Peggy Michael, April Grajczyk, Jeffrey A. Michael and others
Defendant:
Cynthia Burkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tate v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2019cv02147
Plaintiff:
Ella Jean Tate
Defendant:
Dr. Rebcca L. Schroeder, Exact Care Pharmacy and Dr. Veronica Cheung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
First Choice Chiropractic, LLC et al v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2019cv02010
Plaintiff:
Prestige Chiropractic & Injury, LLC, Schroeder Referral Systems, Inc, D.C. Ty Dahodwala and others
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Ohio State Chiropractic Board, The Ohio General Assembly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Schroeder et al v. Dixie Freight Systems, Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Surinder Singh Dhandwar and Dixie Freight Systems, Inc
Plaintiff:
Sabrina L Schroeder and Jeremy Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schroeder v. Kabir Partners, LLC
as 1:2018cv01302
Plaintiff:
Linda Schroeder
Defendant:
Kabir Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
