Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00969
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00970
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00843
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Riddell, Inc. v. Schutt Sports, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00504
Plaintiff:
Riddell, Inc.
Defendant:
Schutt Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Schutt Sports Inc et al
as 3:2009cv03228
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company and Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
Schutt Sports Inc and Riddell Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Riddell, Inc. v. Schutt Sports, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00711
Plaintiff:
Riddell, Inc.
Defendant:
Schutt Sports, Inc. and Schutt Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Everything Baseball Limited, LLC v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company et al
as 1:2008cv03840
Plaintiff:
Everything Baseball Limited, LLC and Everything Baseball Limited, LLC
Defendant:
Wilson Sporting Goods Company, Hunt Wilson International Ltd., Schutt Sports, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anchor Sports I, Inc. v. Schutt Sports, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00246
Plaintiff:
Anchor Sports I, Inc.
Defendant:
Schutt Sports, Inc. and East Texas Sports Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ed Tobergte Associates Company v. Schutt Sports, Inc
as 2:2007cv02181
Plaintiff:
Ed Tobergte Associates Company, Ed Tobergte Associates Company, Ed Tobergte Associates Company and others
Defendant:
Schutt Sports, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
