Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Inman v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Jeff Panken, Christopher Hobb, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Allen Inman
Interested Party:
William A Hill and William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Waller, Thomas Hicks, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Adams
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deterding v. Newton Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility, Scott Miller, Mike Robinson and others
In Re:
William A Hill
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Deterding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Doss
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Newton Correctional Facility, Kris Weitzell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krier v. IDOC et al
as 4:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sean Krier
Defendant:
IDOC, Jeff Pankan, Rich Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatterman v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
David Hatterman
Defendant:
Heather Bell, Jim Michaels, Joe Swain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Morrison et al
as 4:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lothaire Reynolds
Defendant:
Judy Morrison, Mike Schierbrock, Jay Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mapes et al
as 4:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Williams
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Larry Lipscomb and Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Mapes et al
as 4:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Jill Dursky, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mapes et al
as 4:2014cv00377
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Williams
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Larry Lipscomb and Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
