Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Williams v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 21-16137
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior and SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Secretary of the Interior
Center for Biological Diversity v. de la Vega
as 1:2021cv00122
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Scott de la Vega and Debra Haaland
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Neighbors Agst Bison Slaughter, et al v. Nat'l Park Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-35144
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Acting Secretary of the Interior, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BONNIE LYNN and NEIGHBORS AGAINST BISON SLAUGHTER
Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. et al v. de la Vega et al
as 3:2021cv01182
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. and Turtle Island Restoration Network
Defendant: Scott de la Vega and Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Center for Bio. Diversity v. Scott de la Vega, et al
as 21-35121
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ASSOCIATION, WYOMING FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT DE LA VEGA, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior and MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Center for Bio. Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 21-35095
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHAD PADGETT, in his official capacity as State Director for the Bureau of Land Management Alaska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, GREENPEACE, INC. and FRIENDS OF THE EARTH
Amicus Curiae: ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and STATE OF ALASKA
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living, et al v. BLM, et al
as 21-35085
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, SIERRA CLUB, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHAD PADGETT, in his official capacity as State Director for the Bureau of Land Management Alaska and others
Amicus Curiae: ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and STATE OF ALASKA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC.
Ginger Kathrens, et al v. Scott de la Vega, et al
as 21-35094
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLOUD FOUNDATION, AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, GINGER KATHRENS and others
Defendant / Appellant: JEFFREY ROSE, in his official capacity as District Manager of the BLM Burns District Office;, BARRY BUSHUE, in his official capacity as the State Director for BLM Oregon, SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Secretary, Department of the Interior and others
State of Alaska, et al v. Scott De La Vega, et al
as 21-35035
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MARGARET EVERSON, in her official capacity as acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA
Plaintiff: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
WildEarth Guardians et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff: Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Cascadia Wildlands, The Lands Council and others
Defendant: Aurelia Skipworth, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?