Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Pendergrass v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Sean Brantley, Eric Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Pendergrass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack Transou v. Charles Godfrey, et al
as 19-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACK T. TRANSOU
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN BRANTLEY, CHARLES GODFREY and THOMAS J. LIMBIRD, individuals and Godfrey terminated capacity
Transou v. Godfrey et al
as 1:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Mack T. Transou
Defendant:
Doctor (f/n/u) Limbird, Sean Brantley and Charles Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Brantley et al
as 1:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robinson
Defendant:
Sean Brantley, Kelly Garska, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bonds
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Corporations Corrections of America, Derrick Scofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bonds
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Corporations Corrections of America, Derrick Scofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Dunn v. Derreck Schofield, et al
as 15-5660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRECK D. SCHOFIELD
Defendant:
ARVIL CHAPMAN, MICHAEL PARRISH, RHONDA STAGGS and others
Dunn v. Brantley et al
as 1:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Defendant:
Sean Brantley, Richard Burks and f/n/u Stroud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Brantley et al
as 1:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Larry Payne
Defendant:
Sean Brantley, Jason Woodall, Arvil Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Brantley et al
as 3:2014mc00658
Plaintiff:
Larry Payne
Defendant:
Sean Brantley, Alexander Crowe, Richard Burks and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
