Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JONIK et al v. HARLAN et al
as 2:2012cv03129
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN T. JONIK and DONNA JONIK
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARLAN , SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM v. SEARS et al
as 2:2012cv02824
Plaintiff:
MARLITA GRAHAM
Defendant:
SEARS , SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
RIVERS v. KMART CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01301
Plaintiff:
CHANTIA RIVERS
Defendant:
KMART CORPORATION , SEARS HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT , SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAPIDES et al v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv01173
Plaintiff:
GOLDIE LAPIDES and SAMUEL LAPIDES
Defendant:
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HERNANDEZ et al v. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00856
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE HERNANDEZ and DELMY HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION and SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADDELL et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
FRANCES WADDELL and RONALD WADDELL
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS et al
as 5:2011cv03354
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS and SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
