Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
U.S. Anesthesia Prts TX v. HHS
as 24-10384
Plaintiff: U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Incorporated, U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Incorporated and others
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Natl Infusion Center v. Becerra
as 24-50180
Plaintiff: National Infusion Center Association, on behalf of itself and its members, Global Colon Cancer Association, on behalf of itself and its members and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, on behalf of itself and its members
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, In Her Official Capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Corr-Williams v. FDA
as 24-60068
Petitioner: Corr-Williams Company and Fontem US, L.L.C.
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
TX Medical Assoc v. HHS
as 23-40605
Plaintiff / Appellee: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, L.L.C., Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, United States Department of Labor and others
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60545
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association and others
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae: 24 Vaping Product Industry Advocacy Associations
Dierlam v. Biden
as 23-20401
Plaintiff / Appellant: John J. Dierlam
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Fender v. Biden
as 23-20398
Plaintiff / Appellant: Virna Catherine Fender
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense and others
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 23-10564
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas and Lubbock Independent School District
Defendant / Appellant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Jooyuen Chang, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and others
Texas Medical Association v. HHS
as 23-40217
Plaintiff / Appellee: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, L.L.C., Doctor Adam Corley and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?