Cases 21 - 30 of 293
RISENHOOVER v. SHUI-BIAN et al
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Defendant:
CHEN SHUI-BIAN, STEPHEN YOUNG, CLIFFORD HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ABRAHAM SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, MIKE PENSE and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENSON v. AUSTIN
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DENSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and LLOYD AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
FITZGERALD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2022cv03411
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS JOHN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SECRETARY OF STATE, SHERRY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
TURSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2022cv02970
Plaintiff:
NICK TURSE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE / JOINT STAFF and U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
