Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv20270
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00380
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60842
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00517
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00511
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv22283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Younis El Sayedri v. Jefferson B. Sessions III
as 17-6607
Petitioner - Appellant:
YOUNIS EL SAYEDRI
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, CHRISTINE ALEXANDRIA BOGLE, Office of the united state attorney, MICHAEL JOHN FRANK, Office of the united state attorney and others
Emang Matenge v. Jeffery Crawford
as 17-6598
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMANG MATENGE
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERY CRAWFORD, Director & Officer-in-Charge of Farmiville Detention Center, YVONNE EVANS, Director, Washington, D.C. Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Office of Detention and Removal Operations, Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Executive Associate Director, Enforcement & Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
