Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Rodriguez v. Decker
as 20-3735
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Marvin Nolasco Rodriguez
Ferreyra v. Decker
as 20-3437
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Henry Ferreyra, Rolando Oshane Villiers, Jefferson Denizard and others
Brathwaite v. Barr
as 20-3502
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aldwin Brathwaite
Doe v. Decker
as 20-3449
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
John Doe
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3004
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marco Martinez Roman
Respondent / Appellee:
Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Grant v. Decker
as 20-2739
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Dudley Grant
Ogunmola v. Whaling
as 20-2724
Respondent:
William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffery Searls, in his official capacity as Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner:
Saidat Iyabo Ogunmola
Ferreyra v. Decker
as 20-2293
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Henry Ferreyra, Rolando Oshane Villiers, Jefferson Denizard and others
Barbecho v. Decker
as 20-2207
Petitioner:
Milton Barbecho, Jose Molina, Felipe Diaz Presbot and others
Respondent:
Acting Director Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Genus v. Decker
as 20-2122
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Anthony Genus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
