Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Childs v. All-N-1 Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Edward Childs
Defendant:
All-N-1 Security Services, Inc.
Barfield v. Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company, Matthew A. Escobar and ADT Security Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Lynch et al v. John and/or Jane Doe(s) et al
as 1:2019cv00005
Plaintiff:
Bianca Evans and Lorraine Lynch
Defendant:
Allied Universal Security Service, Inc. and John and/or Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREENE v. INTUIT INC et al
as 4:2018cv00199
Defendant:
INTUIT INC, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, MERS INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHEREEN R GREENE
Smith et al v. Corps. Security Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00681
Plaintiff:
De'Egdra Smith and Randricka Taylor
Defendant:
Corps. Security Services, Inc., Pete Cottrell and Bylencia Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Lieberman v. Metropolitan Security Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00633
Plaintiff:
Scott Lieberman
Defendant:
Metropolitan Security Services, Inc. , Edgar Urbina , Highwoods Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
