Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nabala et al v. New Horizon Security Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00406
Plaintiff:
David W. Nabala and Chuks Emenike Iwunna
Defendant:
New Horizon Security Services, Inc. and John M. Frazer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Patel v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01293
Plaintiff:
Shanker Patel
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Reed v. New Horizon Security Services, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
Amber Reed
Defendant:
New Horizon Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jeannie's Jewelers, Inc. v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jeannie's Jewelers, Inc.
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc. , Broadview Security, Inc. and Brink's Home Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nassari v. Virginia Uniformed Security Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00682
Plaintiff:
Mahmood Nassari
Defendant:
Virginia Uniformed Security Services, Inc. and Rami Fathi Abbas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dhruba v. Virginia Uniformed Security Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
Silwal Singh Dhruba
Defendant:
Virginia Uniformed Security Services, Inc. and Rami Fathi Abbas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
