Cases filed in Washington
Mendy v. Larson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01426
Plaintiff: Sang W Mendy
Defendant: Tracy L Larson, Mill Creek Residential Services LLC, Northwest Security Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Garcia et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01995
Plaintiff: Garrett Garcia and Derek Hume
Defendant: ADT Security Services, Inc and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT ASSIGNED
as 2:2015cv00660
Defendant: County of King, James Dow Constantine, Harold Taniguchi and others
Plaintiff: Dave Jutilla and Aiesha S Steward-Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steward-Baker v. King County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00661
Plaintiff: Aiesha S Steward-Baker
Defendant: King County, James Dow Constantine, Harold Taniguchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADT Security Services Inc v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2008cv00905
Plaintiff: ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Security Services Inc
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Starbucks Corporation v. ADT Security Services Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00900
Plaintiff: Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Defendant: ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Security Services Inc
Counter Claimant: ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Security Services Inc
Counter Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Both
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01837
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?