Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moretto v. Securus Technologies et al
as 2:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Stephen Moretto
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, J Pay, N. Stalnaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securus Technologies, LLC v. Daniel McGuinn et al
as 0:2023cv61884
Plaintiff:
Securus Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel McGuinn and Smart Communications Holdings, Inc.
FRANKLIN v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D FRANKLIN
Defendant:
SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC, JPAY INC and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander et al v. Securus Technologies et al
as 8:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Alexander, Jose Torres-Justiniano, Kevin Johnson and others
Defendant:
Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Dimmig et al
as 8:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Grace Bowles, Brian W. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00919
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Noble v. JPAY Securus Technologies Company
as 1:2020cv22696
Defendant:
JPAY Securus Technologies Company
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dwayne Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lester et al v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01092
Plaintiff:
Hamza Isa Maldonado, Troy Griffin, Jessica Meeks and others
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc. and Scotty Rhoden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mojica v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2016mc20505
Plaintiff:
Susan Mojica
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
