Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Mens Suit Outlet, Inc. v. Amguard Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv08735
Plaintiff:
Men's Suit Outlet, Inc. and Mens Suit Outlet, Inc.
Defendant:
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation, AmGuard Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Walker et al v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.,
as 1:2019cv07482
Plaintiff:
Janet Walker and Kimberly Harris
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., an Illinois Corporation and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jane Bruer v. Ritsema and Lyon PC, et al
as 19-16434
Defendant:
GEORGE SARKISOV, husband, BLANCA GUTIERREZ, an unmarried woman, PHILLIPS LAW GROUP PC, an Arizona Professional Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RITSEMA AND LYON PC, a Colorado Professional Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE JOYCE BRUER, an unmarried woman
Jane Bruer v. Sedgwick Claims Management, et al
as 19-16433
Defendant:
GEORGE SARKISOV, husband, BLANCA GUTIERREZ, an unmarried woman, PHILLIPS LAW GROUP PC, an Arizona Professional Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE JOYCE BRUER, an unmarried woman
Defendant / Appellee:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois Corporation
Sedgwick Claims Management Ser v. Robert Delsman
as 09-16809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. DELSMAN, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
