Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davenport v. Selfhelp Community Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07524
Plaintiff:
Russell Davenport
Defendant:
Selfhelp Community Services, Inc. and Tatyana Vasilyeva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trustees of the Local 389 District Council 1707 Home Care Employees Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Selfhelp Community Services, Inc.,
as 1:2015cv05104
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Local 389 District Council 1707 Home Care Employees Health and Welfare Fund , Local 389 District Council 1707 Home Care Employees Health and Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Local 389 District Council 1707 Home Care Employees Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Selfhelp Community Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Nelson v. SelfHelp Community Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05524
Plaintiff:
Ursula Nelson
Defendant:
SelfHelp Community Services, Inc. and Yaihaddy Willan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Selfhelp Community Services, Inc. v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv03460
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Selfhelp Community Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Feldman v. City of New York
as 1:2009cv08381
Defendant:
City of New York
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Feldman
Amicu:
Selfhelp Community Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
