Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Wilkerson v. Presiding Judge et al
as 3:2017cv03077
Petitioner:
Senrick Shern Wilkerson
Respondent:
Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court #3, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02436
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Wilkerson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv02335
Petitioner:
Senrick Shern Wilkerson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkerson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv00805
Petitioner:
Senrick Shern Wilkerson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkerson v. McComis et al
as 3:2016cv00439
Petitioner:
Senrick Shern Wilkerson
Respondent:
Warden McComis and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkerson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv02172
Petitioner:
Senrick Shern Wilkerson
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Senrick Wilkerson v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10458
Petitioner - Appellant:
SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Senrick Wilkerson v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10228
Petitioner - Appellant:
SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Senrick Wilkerson v. Craig Watkin
as 14-10666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG WATKINS, District Attorney
Wilkerson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv02046
Petitioner:
Senrick Shern Wilkerson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
