Cases 1 - 10 of 23
BURMIN et al v. E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
SERGEY BURMIN and KENNETH W. LUKE
Defendant:
E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GENEVA LABORATORIES LIMITED et al v. IOGGIO CO et al
as 2:2018cv17239
Plaintiff:
UNION-SWISS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED and GENEVA LABORATORIES LIMITED
Defendant:
SERGEI MARTIROSOV, XYZ COMPANIES 1-5, IOGGIO CO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
VERENICH v. KARPENKO et al
as 3:2018cv16324
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIYA VERENICH
Defendant:
ABDIKARIM ABUKAR, MOHAMED ABDI and SERGEY KARPENKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARPENKO v. GAZIC TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv11684
Plaintiff:
SERGEY KARPENKO
Defendant:
GAZIC TRUCKING INC. , MOHAMED ABDI , ABDIKARIM ABUKAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KARPENKO v. GAZIC TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv11684
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I TO C, ABDIKARIM ABUKAR, JOHN DOES INCORPORATED I TO C and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEY KARPENKO
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
ABULKHAIR v. GOOGLE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07217
Plaintiff:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC., LAWRENCE EDWARD PAGE and SERGEY MIKHAYLOVICH BRIM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BLEVINS et al v. VOLKSWAGEN AG et al
as 2:2017cv06417
Plaintiff:
STACI BLEVINS , SERGEY BOGOMOLOV , RICHARD HAUGAN and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN AG, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., AUDI AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MATYEV et al v. KAPUSTIN et al
as 1:2016cv00530
Plaintiff:
CHINGIZ MATYEV , SERGEY SMIRNOV and IGOR ZUEV
Defendant:
SERGEY KAPUSTIN, IRINA KAPUSTINA, MICHAEL GOLOVERYA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sergey Aleynikov v. The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
as 2:2015cv02057
Plaintiff:
Sergey Aleynikov
Defendant:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
