Cases 21 - 30 of 48
GANNON v. SETERUS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05517
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GANNON
Defendant:
SETERUS, INC. and OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03445
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WENZEL et al v. SETERUS INC.
as 3:2017cv03188
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL WENZEL and PATRICIA WENZEL
Defendant:
SETERUS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARIS v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2017cv00510
Plaintiff:
ASA PARIS
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , BANK OF AMERICA NA and SETERUS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Leadbeater v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv07655
Plaintiff:
Richard Leadbeater
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. , FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , JOHN DOE'S 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Youssef Genid, et al v. Federal National Mortgage Asso, et al
as 16-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUSSEF GENID and LINDA GENID
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and SETERUS INC, FKA IBM Lender Business Process Services Inc
THOMPSON et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv03658
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA A. THOMPSON and WILLIAM J. THOMPSON
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. , FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
