Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 766
Anane v. Garland
as 24-1403
Petitioner: ISAAC SETH ANANE
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
United States of America v. Randles
as 24-2360
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SETH RANDLES
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Hoegemeyer v. O'Malley
as 24-1440
Plaintiff: SETH W. HOEGEMEYER
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Hopkins et al v. Capital One , N.A. et al
as VAE/1:24-CV-00292
Plaintiff: Hopkins, Ronald Hopkins, Jerry Magaa and others
Defendant: Capital One , N.A, Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Financial Corp.
PORT v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
as NJ/3:24-CV-01006
Plaintiff: PORT and HOWARD PORT
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
Petitioner: Scott C. Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
Seneca, et al. v. Homeaglow Inc
as 24-887
Plaintiff: SETH SENECA and LISA ANDOH, individually on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant: HOMEAGLOW INC, a Delaware corporation doing business as Dazzling Cleaning
Pitts v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as OHS/3:24-CV-00047
Plaintiff: Pitts and Shantell Pitts
Defendant: Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One, N.A.
Petitioner: Scott C. Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
Hector Rodriguez et al v. Activision Blizzard Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01287
Plaintiff: Hector Rodriguez, Seth Abner and HECZ, LLC
Defendant: Activision Blizzard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J, et al.
as 24-789
Plaintiff: GABRIEL REED, as Next of Friend to M.R.
Defendant: EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J, PAULA MCCOWN, JONATHAN ANDREW DEY, JR. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?