Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nathan Smith v. Pyrorcashman LLP, et al
as 22-56035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
PYRORCASHMAN LLP, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, BONHAMS AND BUTTERFIELDS AUCTIONEERS CORPORATION and others
Green v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP et al
as 4:2022cv04664
Plaintiff:
Attorney Horace W Green
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP Retirement Plan For Partners, et al.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Nathan Smith v. Pyrorcashman LLP et al
as 2:2022cv03765
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Pyrorcashman LLP, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Bonhams and Butterfields Auctioneers Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04884
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Michael Leon v. Janet Dunlop, et al
as 13-17650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LEON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET R. DUNLOP, WILLIAM A. DORSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Bernstein et al v. Dunlop et al
as 3:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
John L. Bernstein, Mary Helen Bernstein, Michael A. Leon and others
Defendant:
Janet Dunlop, William A. Dorsey, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-16712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv04195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
