Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv08701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shand v. White Glove Community Care Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06635
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Shand and Stephanie Cohen
Defendant:
White Glove Community Care Inc. and Meir Lefkowitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shand v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv07479
Plaintiff:
Blair Shand
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Shands v. The City of White Plains et al
as 1:2018cv08753
Defendant:
The District Attorney's Office of Westchester County and The City of White Plains
Plaintiff:
Annette Shands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shands v. The City of White Plains et al
as 1:2018cv05721
Plaintiff:
Annette Shands
Defendant:
The City of White Plains, New York and The District Attorney's Office of Westchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shand v. Mendez et al
as 1:2016cv03950
Plaintiff:
Jamal Shand
Defendant:
Maria Mendez, Ryan Marrero, Michael Carolan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Shand v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02017
Plaintiff:
Deborah Shand
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv04260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
