Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Farmer (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah S. Farmer and Jeremiah Shane Farmer
Defendant:
USA, J. McCall and A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scofield v. Deeper Green Benefit LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Shane Scofield
Defendant:
Deeper Green Benefit LLC d/b/a Neighborhood Sun and Shared Solar Advisor USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Scofield v. LGG Operations, LLC
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Shane Scofield
Defendant:
LGG Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Stevens (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv02665
Petitioner:
Shane Stevens
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodge (PS) v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane H.W. Goodge
Defendant:
Calhoun and Joseph Roybal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodge (PS) v. Calhoun
as 1:2023cv02465
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane H.W. Goodge
Defendant:
Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Michelich
as 1:2023cv02384
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
Andres Michelich, Brian Hoefling, Shane Schmalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Schmalz
as 1:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
Shane Schmalz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. USA
as 1:2023cv02067
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Shane Farmer
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Goodge (PS) v. Park et al
as 1:2023cv01814
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane H.W. Goodge
Defendant:
Park, Wendy Kendall, Joseph Royball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
