Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dropkin v. Blair et al
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Stuart Dropkin
Defendant:
Rainer M. Blair, Matt McGrew, Emmanuel Ligner and others
Carter v. DOC Commissioner et al
as 1:2024mc00084
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
DOC Commissioner and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Troxler et al
as 1:2024mc00063
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
BOP Bureau Chief Shane Troxler and The DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re Danaher Corporation Derivative Litigation
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva and Stuart Dropkin
Defendant:
Rainer M. Blair, Feroz Dewan, Linda Filler and others
Windell v. Frazier
as 1:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Shane Windell
Defendant:
Larry Frazier, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert James Piper
Defendant:
Warden Scott Ceresini, Peggy Chrowie, Sherri Gorlwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb Jr. v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
William J Webb Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Postal Service, Renee Hrivnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mai v. Blades et al
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Sir Cea G. Mai, Evonca Sakinah S. Aliahmed, David Allen Allemandi and others
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Dean J. Blades, Chaplain Rory Russell, Major Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
