Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Copeland v. Scott et al
as 5:2018cv00222
Defendant: FNU Baez, FNU Rosin, Brian Riedl and others
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Harvey et al
as 5:2018cv00198
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: FNU Harvey, FNU Desmond, Rashaundra Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Copeland v. Michael McGhee, et al
as 18-11687
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHANNON COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL P. MCGHEE, DAVID T. MCGHEE, BETTY JOE MCGHEE and others
COPELAND v SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00173
Petitioner: SHANNON COPELAND
Respondent: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Santucci et al
as 9:2018cv80361
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: FNU Santucci, Haywood, Effie Tranchese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPELAND v. PARTRIDGE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00140
Plaintiff: SHANNON COPELAND
Defendant: PARTRIDGE, CHAD SMITH, PHINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv14086
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Respondent: Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018cv00114
Petitioner: Shannon Copeland
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00115
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Julie Jones, FNU Gartman, FNU Pippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2018cv14068
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?