Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benz-Whitebird v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Ms. Daniel Patrick Benz-Whitebird
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith, Dr. Mundo-Bruno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hageman et al v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2021cv02096
Plaintiff:
Adam Hagman, Dane Vander Voort, Paul Primrose and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Shannon Reimann, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Daniel Clark v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 20-2436
Respondent / Appellee:
Shannon Reimann, Warden and Paul Schnell, Minnesota Department of Corrections Commissioner
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathan Daniel Clark
Zimmermann v. Reimann
as 0:2020cv01300
Petitioner:
Jeremy Shane Zimmermann
Respondent:
Shannon Reimann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Schnell et al
as 0:2020cv00248
Respondent:
Paul Schnell and Shannon Reimann
Petitioner:
Nathan Daniel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schnagl v. Reimann
as 0:2019cv02611
Petitioner:
Aaron Jude Schnagl
Defendant:
Shannon Reimann and Chisago County Attorney's Office, MN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braun v. D.O.C. et al
as 0:2018cv03355
Defendant:
Timothy Taggart, Kathryn Halvorson, Steve Kriha and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrance Alfonzo Dudley v. Eddie Miles, et al
as 14-2885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrance Alfonso Dudley
Defendant - Appellee:
Eddie Miles, Tom Roy, Paige Lemay and others
Dudley v. Miles et al
as 0:2013cv02737
Plaintiff:
Terrance Alfonzo Dudley
Defendant:
Eddie Miles, Tom Roy, Paige Lemay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
