Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Wethington v. Parris et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wethington
Defendant:
Mike Parris, Stacy Oaks, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Bibb Houston
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tareynton Reshard Rogers
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Shawn Phillips and Joshua Kays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hempstead v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, David Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Phillips
as 3:2023cv01243
Petitioner:
Darius Darrell Lee
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Phillips
as 2:2023cv02791
Petitioner:
Bryant Ward
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dotson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Jeff Hayes, Brett Cobble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grasty v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Quinzell La'Won Grasty
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
